Skip to main content

What Every Parent with Teenagers Should Know About Sexting

What Every Parent with Teenagers Should Know About Sexting

The uncomfortable reality in today’s technologically advanced world is that teenagers engage in sexting. Sexting is when one party sends sexually suggestive photographs of themselves or others via cell phone to another party, most commonly his or her romantic interest. Passing sexually explicit images to one another is a long-standing activity that has only been made easier with cell phone technology. Teenagers especially have taken full advantage of this phenomenon.

What parents do not realize is that teenagers face a large number of risks by engaging in this type of behavior. Teenagers who sext may face social humiliation and ostracism if their personal images are shared with others without their consent.  More importantly, teenagers who are caught with sexually suggestive images of their underage girlfriends or boyfriends on their phones may be prosecuted as sex offenders. This might sound drastic and unnecessary, but, as explained below, underage sexting falls within the parameters of the Sexual Exploitation of Minors criminal statute in Washington, previously known as the Child Pornography statute.

In Washington, RCW 9.68A makes it illegal to, among other things, disseminate, possess, and view pictures of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. More specifically, the language of the statute reads, “A person commits the crime of dealing in depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct in the second degree when he or she: … Knowingly develops, duplicates, publishes, prints, disseminates, exchanges … any visual or printed matter that depicts a minor engaged in an act of sexually explicit conduct.” When a minor takes a sexually explicit photo of his or herself and sends it to his or her significant other, the minor has disseminated the photograph. Also, because RCW 9.68A.070 makes it a crime to possess a depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, the recipient of such a photograph can be charged with a crime as well.

RCW 9.68A.040 states that a person, regardless of age, is guilty of sexual exploitation of a minor when they “aid” a minor in engaging in sexually explicit conduct, “knowing that such conduct will be photographed.” The statute broadly defines “sexually explicit conduct,” and that definition most likely covers the types of images that are transmitted through sexting. Therefore, any teenager who takes a sexually explicit photo of his or her significant other can easily be charged under this statute.

Sexual exploitation of a minor is a class B felony, punishable by confinement in a state correctional institution for a term of ten years, or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of twenty thousand dollars, or by both. Moreover, anyone charged with this crime must register as a sex offender. Anyone who has heard of a sex offender registry or knows anything about what it means to be a registered sex offender can tell you that this is a life-ruiner.

Prosecutors in Washington have already charged teenagers under this statute. In 2010, three teenagers in Lacey were charged under the child pornography statute after they sexted a nude photo of a middle school student. The charges were later reduced. Teenagers are being charged under similar state statutes in other parts of the country. In 2009, female high school students, all 14 to 15 years old, were charged with disseminating child pornography. The 16 and 17-year-old boys who received the sexts were charged with possession. In 2013, similar charges were filed against two students in Pennsylvania after a 13 year-old-girl sent sexually explicit photos of herself to a 14 year-old-boy.

No matter where you stand on teenagers sexting, most parents can agree that it is severe to force teenagers to undergo the process of being charged as sex offenders. However, until the legislature creates a bill that deals directly with sexting, prosecutors will work with what they have. Just as parents are encouraged to talk to their children about the consequences of drug use, parents should also inform their children about the long-term social and legal consequences of sexting. It only takes one sexually explicit photograph of a minor on a phone to turn a teenager into a sex offender.

 

Written by Anastasia Kidniz

Update on Chamique Holdsclaw’s Assault Charges

Update on Chamique Holdsclaw’s Assault Charges

Chamique Holdsclaw committed one of the worst girlfriend breakups in history by chasing down her girlfriend for ending their relationship, pulling a gun, and shooting up her car.  The former WNBA great did just that and more back in 2012 (see my blog “Former WNBA Player Chamique Holdsclaw’s Assault on Ex Girlfriend” for all the details).  Six official criminal charges have been filed against Holdsclaw for the attack on her ex-girlfriend Jennifer Lacy, also a former WNBA teammate.

Holdsclaw’s criminal charges include 2 counts of aggravated assault, 2 counts of second degree criminal damage, 1 count of first degree criminal damage, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.  That’s a nasty breakup!

If found guilty of all charges, Chamique Holdsclaw could serve up to 65 years in jail.

The message of Holdsclaw story 1) be careful in who you date,  2) sulk at home by yourself, watch movies, eat ice cream etc. when you go through a break up, don’t resort to violence, and 3) hire one hell of a defense attorney if you rack up 6 criminal charges!

 

Written by S.O

heleyna holmes photography 003

Bobby Brown is Sentenced to 55 Days in Jail for DUI #2.

Bobby Brown is Sentenced to 55 Days in Jail for DUI #2.

Follow up report.  Bobby Brown is going to spend some time in the slammer for his latest charge of DUI that occurred in October 2012 (check out my blog “Snaps!  Bobby Brown’s 2nd DUI This Year” for the DUI arrest details).

Earlier today, retired singing sensation Bobby Brown, pled no contest to the DUI and driving on a license suspended charges.  The judge sentenced him to 55 days in jail, 4 years of probation, and completion of an 18 month DUI and alcohol treatment program.   Brown was also ordered to attend 3 Alcoholics Anonymous meeting per week until he starts his jail time, which must begin by March 20th.

This is Bobby Brown’s third DUI in his lifetime.  The first DUI occurred in 1996, followed by his second and third DUI in 2012.

Here in Washington State, if a person is guilty of a second DUI within seven years, they would be facing a jail sentence ranging from a minimum of 30 days to a maximum of 364 days behind bars.   They would also need to invest in a good pair of sneakers or a bus pass because they would lose their driver’s license for a minimum of 2 years and up to a max of 2 1/2 years.  Lets not forget fines ranging from $1196.00 to $5000.00 and electric home monitoring post jail time for at least 60 days.

 

Written by S.O